Sunday 25 March 2012

PHILIP DAVIES CONSERVATIVE MP FOR SHIPLEY STAR GUEST ON C4 THE MORNING LINE SATURDAY MARCH 24th 2012

Contact Philip

Tell Philip your concerns about issues or ask him a question about an issue.

Philip makes it a point to be in touch with his constituents and wants his constituents to be in touch with him. If you have any concerns, even if you are not a constituent, please do not hesitate to contact Philip.

If you have tried to contact Philip in the past via the form on the website, please accept our apologies if we have not been in touch. The form has been experiencing technical difficulties.

You can use one of the following methods to reach Philip:

Email Philip: daviesp@parliament.uk

Write to Philip:
Philip Davies MP
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA

Phone Philip:
In the Constituency - 01274 592248
In Westminster - 020 7219 8264


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Davies
http://www.philip-davies.org.uk/text.aspx?id=15
http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/

Friday 23 March 2012

DAVID CAMERON'S NEGATIVE LIP SERVICE

DAVID CAMERON at loggerheads over Scotland wanting better for all Scottish  people, Scottish people who have no confidence in the English political system or David Cameron and his  False Lip Service and Dictatorial Bully Boy Tactics.



TAKING A CLOSER LOOK at the fundamental British political system is a frightening experience belonging way back in the tenth century upsides the recent form of the British Horseracing Authority and their Bloodhorse Illiterate Whip Review.

J Margaret Clarke Turfcall Comment.

Monday 19 March 2012

ANDREW MARR SHOW SUNDAY MARCH 18th 2012 9am to 10am AHEAD OF THE BUDGET ON WEDNESDAY


 
J.MARGARET CLARKE TURFCALL COMMENT

SUNDAY'S ANDREW MARR SHOW AHEAD OF THE BUDGET ON WEDNESDAY
ANDREW MARR TALKS TO GEORGE OSBORNE AND ED BALLS

Highlighted the shocking state that the British political system has sunk to. Completely out of touch as to the needs and rights of 80 per cent of the British people to whom they have been voted in to serve and to care about.

There remain to be an awful lot of questions that need honest answers from all politicians nationwide. No wonder that Alex Salmond wants better for the people of Scotland.

Clearly we are not considered worthy of being allowed any answers either before Wednesday's budget or after Wednesday's budget. Left to put up and to shut up being the political view and to make sure we are polite at all times while we put up with the political dictate and polite while we shut up over the political dictate.

What do the poor people in this country think about the present situation of their hard earned tax monies being used to bale out the banks, and  the billionaire bankers?

When did the politicians ask the poorest of the tax payers if they could use their money to bale out the banks?

When do the poor get any interest back for baling out the banks?

When do the poor get any interest back off the millions and the billions of pounds
that each and every banker takes in remuneration?

What sort of people are these bankers considered to be?

What sort of people would go out of their way to rip off the poor and the homeless for only their own gain? When there are people all around the world dying of starvation every day in horrific circumstances, to say nothing about the animals.

It is noted that the poor do not get any say in this issue at all  ... put up and shut up
appears to be the politicians out of touch tactic toward such people.

These politicians have over decades been running this country in secret, 'tell them nothing attitude' same as the British horseracing regulators.

In the early 1970's the Jockey Club horseracing regulators allowed female licenses to train and to ride.  It has taken fifty years for a female bloodhorse literate handler rider
Haley Turner to reach any sort of recognition at all for her skills in the saddle. A bloodhorse literate achiever in her own right. 

It is blatantly obvious that those who have made and continue to make such a mess of regulating British horseracing,  that these politicians too are using the same principles in attempting to run what is now termed to be Rip-off-Britain.

LOOKS like for sure the budget on Wednesday will not be worth the paper it is written on a total waist of money and time.

Friday 2 March 2012

GOVERNMENT BOOKMAKERS RACECOURSES RIP- OFF HORSEMEN


RACING POST REPORT FRIDAY MARCH 2nd 2012

TOM BOYLE "HORSEMAN'S GROUP (HG) FURY OVER LEVY DISCUSSIONS


"THE HORSEMAN'S GROUP has branded levy talks between the three
biggest racecourse groups and major bookmakers unacceptable and
accused Racecourse Association members of working against racing's interests.

 
"The discussions, revealed by the Racing Post on Sunday (26.02.2012)
are aimed at ending the sport's reliance on the levy as the government seeks to remove itself from racing's funding mechanism and bring off-shore betting under the Gambling Commission licensing structures.

"The HG believes it is being excluded from the debate and in an open letter to
Ian Barlow of the RCA, chairman Paul Dixon said the talks were fuelled by "vested interests" and he accused the RCA of working to present his members with a "fait accompli".

"Dixon wrote: 'secret meetings and agreements cobbled together by a couple of vested interests is no way for an industry of this importance to proceed, however much the major bookmakers might prefer it.

"This type of unilateral action by racecourses is unacceptable , coming - as it does - in the middle of a process which is supposed to end up with the commercial elements of our sport being led jointly by you, the racecourses, and us, the Horseman's Group.

"The major racecourses should not, Dixon said, be taking part in any negotiations " if racing is to achieve the best deal possible".

"The racecourses' main negotiation tool with bookmakers, said Dixon, was the size of the fixture list. "Uniquely among those involved in racing, the racecourses' declared point of view - for their own commercial reasons - is that, broadly, the larger the fixture list, the better, not least because they get paid more in media rights fees for every race they stage ."


"Dixon added: "Your members are - in business terminology - conflicted, owing to the hugely significant commercial negotiations they have with bookmakers."

"Representatives of William Hill, Coral and Ladbrokes have held discussions with their counterparts at Arena Leisure, Jockey Club Racecourses and Northern Racing on a proposal to continue the levy on the lines of the current scheme, but for longer than 12 months.

"A three - to - five - year deal could see bookmakers guarantee £75 million in the first year rising to £85m in the final years. Meanwhile, the two parties would work on fixture lists and a racing programme designed to maximise racing's return from betting.

"While Dixon said the HG wanted to see the shortcomings of the levy system addressed and the process of determining it less cumbersome, he added: "That does not, though, mean that the Horseman's Group is going to accept its members' main revenue stream being determined behind its back by other vested interests."